Bottle Printing Technology by Heat transfer printing,water transfer printing and Digital Printing
Comparison of Heat Transfer, Hydrographic Transfer, and Digital Printing for Plastic Containers (Bottles, Cups, etc.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d957/7d9577b7ab74a4ed988a5b6d4adab3fe22d155ce" alt="Bottle Printing Technology by Heat transfer printing VS water transfer printing VS Digital Printing - Business News - 1 Bottle Ditial Printing"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06ff4/06ff42a1247d8988cdc152965335fde0c3ef43cc" alt="Bottle Printing Technology by Heat transfer printing VS water transfer printing VS Digital Printing - Business News - 2 Bottle Water Transfer Printing"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9a87/e9a876fe900c66aea93430400e774ea425e63131" alt="Bottle Printing Technology by Heat transfer printing VS water transfer printing VS Digital Printing - Business News - 3 Bottle Heat Transfer Printing"
Heat transfer, hydrographic transfer, and digital printing are three mainstream technologies for surface printing on plastic containers. Their differences and advantages in process characteristics, application scenarios, and cost-effectiveness are systematically analyzed below:
1. Core Comparison of bottle printing technology
- Heat Transfer
- Principle: Transfers ink from a transfer film to the substrate under high-temperature pressing (200–230°C).
- Key Equipment: Heat press machine (requires custom molds), transfer film production line.
- Material Compatibility: Requires heat-resistant substrates (e.g., PET ≥220°C grade, modified PP).
- Hydrographic Transfer
- Process: Activates water-soluble film with solvents, then uses hydraulic pressure to wrap 3D curved surfaces.
- Requirements: Activator spray (xylene-based solvents), PU protective coating (UV or thermal curing).
- Structural Adaptability: Handles undercuts (0.5–2mm depth).
- Digital Printing
- Technologies: UV inkjet (dominant), Latex inks, electronic inks.
- Resolution: Industrial-grade devices achieve 2400×1200 dpi (e.g., EFI VUTEk systems).
- Pre-Treatment: Plasma treatment required (surface energy ≥42 mN/m).
2. Cost-Benefit Analysis
Metric | Heat Transfer | Hydro Transfer | Digital Printing |
---|---|---|---|
MOQ | 10k+ units | 500+ units | 1 unit |
Unit Cost (Φ100mm Cup) | ¥0.8–1.2 (mass production) | ¥3.5–5.0 | ¥6.0–15.0 |
Setup Change Time | 4–6 hours (film prep) | 0.5 hours | Instant |
Energy Consumption | 8–12 kW/h | 3–5 kW/h | 2–3 kW/h |
3. Quality Performance
- Weather Resistance
- Heat Transfer: Passes 500h QUV accelerated aging (ΔE ≤3).
- Hydro Transfer: Significant fading after 300h QUV (ΔE ≥5).
- Digital Printing: UV types withstand 800h QUV (with light stabilizers).
- Adhesion
- Heat Transfer: 5B rating (3M 610 tape test).
- Hydro Transfer: 3B (depends on primer compatibility).
- Digital Printing: Requires pre-treatment for 4B rating.
- Curved Surface Adaptability
- Hydro Transfer: Handles complex curves (radius ≥2mm).
- Digital Printing: Limited to single-curvature surfaces (e.g., cylinders).
- Heat Transfer: Requires custom silicone molds for conformity.
4. Application Scenarios
- Mass Production (>500k units/year): Heat transfer optimal (40% cost reduction vs. alternatives).
- Promotional Items (500–5k units): Hydro transfer for 360° patterns (92% yield).
- Customization (1–500 units): Digital printing for variable data (QR codes, serial numbers; lead time <24h).
- Functional Packaging: Digital printing with specialty inks (e.g., silver conductive inks).
WeChat
Scan the QR Code with wechat